The relative similarity in body shape between nauplii — a slightly elongated sphere, different from the more elongated body form of the copepodites — suggests that it is optimized for motility or other purposes.
The Reynolds number calculated for average jump velocities ranges from 0. Thygesen [Unpublished]. For escape jumps the velocity and thus Re would be higher for T. Thygesen, [Unpublished]. Thus, the aspect ratio of the body of the smallest nauplii, and the decrease in aspect ratio with increasing size found in T. The advantage of optimal shape to the nauplius is maybe not so much to minimize energetic costs that are assumed to be low [41] — [42] , but to allow the highest possible speed during rapid escape and prey attack jumps A.
Prey detection and prey capture in copepod nauplii [Unpublished]. The more slender body of copepodites aspect ratio below 0. In comparison, the body shape of barnacle nauplii Cirripedia , which are slow swimmers exhibiting no or only weak escape responses [43] — [44] , is very far from streamlined.
Their aspect ratios, even excluding the stout fronto-lateral horns, lie generally in the range of 0. The free-swimming nauplius is functionally plastic and modes of locomotion may differ significantly, even between closely related crustacean species [26]. However, the three described copepod species are roughly similar in the way they jump. The kinematics of nauplii jumping differ from those of the copepodites and adults T.
In copepodites the thoracic appendages move metachronally only during the power stroke, while the recovery stroke is synchronized. In the nauplii the recovery strokes are never perfectly synchronized and there is always a phase delay between the appendages, particularly in A. Because of the poorly synchronized recovery stroke and due to the low Reynolds number of the jumps, the swimming pattern of the nauplii becomes very erratic, with the nauplius even moving backwards during the recovery stroke Figs.
Forward propulsion at low Re numbers is only possible because of the asymmetry between the beat and recovery phases. The same pattern of reducing drag by spreading and collapsing setae has been described for nauplii of Calanus finmarchicus [17] as well as for the swimming legs of adult C.
Moreover, in the nauplii the phase delay between appendages is shorter during recovery than during the beat phase Fig. This suggests that leg recovery in copepodites produces very little resistance and counter force. The Stokes time scale spans from 1 ms in the smallest to 10 ms in the largest nauplii. However, during the recovery stroke, the nauplius stops much sooner and then moves backwards.
Thus, the recovery stroke in the nauplii is not so well adapted for forward swimming as in the copepodites. Temora longicornis nauplii have a beat time scale around 10 ms, Fig. These nauplii backed very little during the recovery stroke Fig. In the other end, nauplii of A.
In contrast the adults of O. Nauplii of other crustaceans, e. In contrast, many protists, swim more smoothly than copepod nauplii because they have very high beat frequencies compared with the Stokes time scale, and much better adapted recovery strokes [10] , [51].
Thus, nauplii appear to be very inefficient jumpers, in contrast to the copepodites. This is accomplished by the formation of viscous vortex rings as they jump. Such rings only form if the duration of the power stroke is short relative to the viscous time scale of the fluid disturbance that they generate [24] — [25].
The calculated jump numbers decrease with size, in T. Thus, jumping nauplii do not form viscous vortex rings, and their propulsion efficiency is likely to be a few percent, such as is characteristic for high-jump number swimming at low Re [51].
This implies that the energetic cost of jumping in nauplii is relatively much higher than in copepodites, especially in the small nauplii. Given the universality of the nauplius body plan, it may be surprising that they perform so poorly as swimmers. Nauplii of other crustaceans perform even worse, e. This is in contrast to the copepodite body plan that in many respects appears particularly well adapted to a planktonic life: The muscle-filled torpedo-shaped body and well-coordinated appendage movement allow very high escape speeds, a feature that is considered key to the success of copepods in the ocean [54].
In addition to jumping, the nauplii of T. Although carried out by the same three pairs of appendages, this motility mode is fundamentally different from jumping and comprises much more complex beat patterns. Slow swimming results in very erratic translation and forward propulsion is therefore inefficient.
The main purpose of the slow swimming mode is to create a feeding current. The nauplii of A. Translation velocity in T. Thus, these nauplii are essentially hovering while feeding.
This is likely achieved through the counter phase beating and rotation of the appendages. It is well documented that hovering is more efficient than cruising through the water, both in terms of energy expenditure per volume of water scanned [55] and in terms of volume water cleared per unit force produced [56]. Thus, the nauplii of T. There may, however, be a cost to this feeding behavior, because the spatial extension of the fluid disturbance generated by hovering is substantially larger than that generated by cruising through the water and, thus, the vulnerability of the feeding nauplii to rheotactic predators may be elevated [57].
Nauplii have only three pairs of functional appendages, and the species investigated here appear to perform poorly when swimming-by-jumping. This seems also to be the case for a number of other crustacean nauplii, and is in sharp contrast to copepodites that are equipped with specialized swimming legs and are highly efficient swimmers capable of obtaining very high escape speeds.
Nauplii of the three species investigated also perform escape jumps, and it remains to be investigated if these are more efficient than relocation jumps. That could be achieved by higher beat frequencies and better coordinated beat patterns. This motility mode is carried out with the same appendages as jumping, but it is fundamentally different.
Example jumps of Temora longicornis nauplii played in slow motion X Body lengths: 1: 0. Example jumps of Oithona davisae nauplii played in slow motion X Body lengths 1: 0.
Example jumps of Acartia tonsa played in slow motion X Example swimming sequences of Temora longicornis played in slow motion X Browse Subject Areas? Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. Abstract Copepod nauplii move in a world dominated by viscosity. Introduction Copepod nauplii are ubiquitous, abundant and productive metazoans in the ocean [1] — [2].
Download: PPT. Table 1. Characteristics of the experimental nauplii and their repositioning jumps and swimming. In addition, it has pairs of swimming legs or jumping legs, which allows it to jump in order to escape or to attack. These are used less frequently and very briefly.
The muscles in the two systems are fairly similar, but the gearing of the jumping mechanism is tuned to short bursts of immense force. Even though the copepod is both blind and so tiny that the water feels as thick as syrup, it has managed to solve the engineering feat of fleeing quickly and efficiently from predators.
The solution is the two propulsion mechanisms with different gearing. Its well-developed senses interpret extremely quickly signals from the ambient and sends the message on to the swimming legs.
This is made possible by a nerve transmission system that is exceptionally rapid for an invertebrate animal, and which can be explained by the special design of the neural pathways. The streamlined, hydro-dynamic shape and pure muscular strength of the copepod is what explains its most powerful jump. Humes AG How many copepods? Calbet A, Landry MR Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems.
Limnology and Oceanography 49 : 51— Journal of Protozoology 32 : — Fenchel T Protozoan filter feeding. Progress in Protistology, Volume 1. Bristol: Biopress. Fenchel How dinoflagellates swim. Protist : — Marine Ecology Progress Series 48 : 1— Goldstein SF Flagellar beat patterns in algae.
In: Melkonian M, editor. Algal Cell Motility. New York: Chapman and Hall. Reports on Progress in Physics 72 : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences : — In: Taylor FJR, editor.
The biology of dinoflagellates. Oxford: Blackwell. Crenshaw HC Orientation by helical motion — I. Kinematics of the helical motion of organisms with up to six degrees of freedom. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 55 : — Crenshaw HC A new look at locomotion in microorganisms: rotating and translating. American Zoologist 36 : — Crustaceana 23 : — Lowndes The swimming and feeding of certain calanoid copepods. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2 : — Gauld DT Swimming and feeding in crustacean larvae: the naulius larva.
Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London : 31— Swimming and flying in nature. New York: Plenum Press. Syllogeus 58 : 51— Marine Ecology Progress Series 57 : — Journal of Experimental Biology : — Marine Ecology Progress Series : — Journal of the Royal Society Interface 7 : — Journal of the Royal Society Interface 8 : — Williams TA The nauplius larva of crustaceans: functional diversity and the phylotypic stage.
American Zoologist 34 : — Bulletin of Marine Science 53 : 29— Journal of Plankton Research 18 : — Van Duren L, Videler JJ Swimming behaviour of developmental stages of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornis at different food concentrations.
Titelman Swimming and escape behavior of copepod nauplii: implications for predator-prey interactions among copepods. Gerritsen Instar-specific swimming patterns and predation of planktonic copepods. Buskey EJ Factors affecting feeding selectivity of visual predators on the copepod Acartia tonsa : locomotion, visibility, and escape responses. Ho SH A phylogenetic analysis of copepod orders.
Journal of Crustacean Biology 10 : — London: The Ray Society. Dusenbery DB Living at micro scale. The unexpected physics of being small. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Vlymen WJ Energy expenditure of swimming copepods. Limnology and Oceanography 15 : — Svetlichnyy LS Speed, force and energy expenditure in the movement of copepods.
Oceanology 27 : — Moyse J Some observations on the swimming and feeding of the nauplius larvae of Lepas pectinata Cirripedia:Crustacea. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 80 : — Crustaceana 3 : — Journal of Crustacean Biology 23 : — Limnology and Oceanography 52 : — Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B : — Journal of Marine Systems 49 : — Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 44 : 1— Physical Review Letters : Hyams JS, Borisy GG Isolated flagellar apparatus of Chlamydomonas : Characterization of forward swimming and alteration of waweform and reversal motion by calcium ions.
Journal of Cell Science 33 : — Journal of Plankton Research 33 : — Part II: Numerical simulation. Journal of Plankton Research 24 : — Christensen-Dalsgaard K, Fenchel T Increased filtration efficiency of attached compared to free-swimming flagellates. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 33 : 77— Though plankton drift with the ocean currents, that doesn't mean they're incapable of any movement.
Many of them can move to find food or mates, and they do so in some surprising and sometimes entertaining ways. The first creature -- a dinoflagellate -- wanders about like a wind-up mouse, complete with comic flapping tail. The rotifer at seems to be some sort of larval Cthulhu. The ciliate protist at looks and moves like some sort of alien probe. But did you notice any patterns? For plankton, moving is necessary but dangerous. Their predators have a nasty habit of finding prey by sensing moving water.
On the other hand, plankton both moving and swimming should be willing to disturb more water, because feeding is so critical to survival that it is worth taking a greater risk to do it in this, penguins are no different from plankton. On the other hand, if the only purpose of swimming is to get from Point A to Point B, there's no reason that natural selection shouldn't have favored methods of getting that done that disturb as little water as possible, as briefly as possible.
That is exactly what the scientists found when they observed particle flow around moving plankton.
0コメント